Sepsis protocol adherence and emergency department overcrowding: An observational study
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33024/minh.v8i2.870
Adherence Emergency Department (ED) Sepsis Protocol
Abstract
Background: Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding is a persistent global challenge that affects the quality and timeliness of patient care, particularly for sepsis management. Despite established guidelines such as the hour-1 sepsis bundle and national sepsis guideline, adherence remains inconsistent.
Purpose: To analyze the relationship between sepsis protocol compliance and emergency unit crowding.
Method: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, analyzing adult sepsis and septic shock patients triaged as Priority 1. Data on patient demographics, sepsis severity scores, ED occupancy rates, and adherence to sepsis protocols using the Hour-1 sepsis bundle and the National Sepsis Guideline were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s Exact Test to examine associations between ED overcrowding and compliance with sepsis protocols, with a significance threshold of p<0.05.
Results: This study included 38 cases with a mean age of 56.6 years and the majority (52.6%) of patients were female. Most cases were diagnosed with septic shock (55.3%) and the average occupancy rate of the emergency department was 80.8%. Serum lactate measurements were performed in 68.4% of cases, blood culture sampling in 21.1%, and broad-spectrum antibiotics were given in 94.7%. Full compliance with both sepsis protocols was only 5.3%. Compliance with fluid resuscitation was high at 97.4%, while compliance with blood culture sampling was low at 5.3% and 7.9%. No significant association was found between protocol compliance and ED crowding (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: There was no significant correlation between ED crowding and adherence to sepsis protocols. Strategic and clinical policy interventions are needed to improve adherence to sepsis management guidelines.
Suggestion: Future research should investigate additional barriers to sepsis care, such as financial constraints, physician decision-making processes, and variations in adherence across healthcare settings to develop more comprehensive strategies to improve sepsis outcomes worldwide.
Downloads
References
Biteker, F. S., Özlek, E., Çelik, O., Özlek, B., & Biteker, M. (2017). Emergency department crowding and sepsis. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 36(2), 325-326.
Chau, E. Y. W., Bakar, A. A., Zamhot, A. B., Zaini, I. Z., Binti Adanan, S. N., & Sabardin, D. M. B. (2024). An observational study on the impact of overcrowding towards door-to-antibiotic time among sepsis patients presented to emergency department of a tertiary academic hospital. BMC Emergency Medicine, 24(1), 58.
Darraj, A., Hudays, A., Hazazi, A., Hobani, A., & Alghamdi, A. (2023). The association between emergency department overcrowding and delay in treatment: a systematic review. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 385). MDPI.
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., & Levy, M. (2021). Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Critical care medicine, 49(11), e1063-e1143.
Gaieski, D. F., Agarwal, A. K., Mikkelsen, M. E., Drumheller, B., Sante, S. C., Shofer, F. S., & Pines, J. M. (2017). The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. The American journal of emergency medicine, 35(7), 953-960.
Gilbert, J. A. (2018). Sepsis care bundles: a work in progress. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 6(11), 821-823.
Kenny, J. F., Chang, B. C., & Hemmert, K. C. (2020). Factors affecting emergency department crowding. Emergency medicine clinics, 38(3), 573-587.
Lam, R. P. K., Hung, K. K. C., Lui, C. T., Kwok, W. S., Lam, W. W. T., Lau, E. H. Y., & Rainer, T. H. (2024). Early sepsis care with the National Early Warning Score 2-guided Sepsis Hour-1 Bundle in the emergency department: hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pilot stepped wedge randomised controlled trial (NEWS-1 TRIPS) protocol. BMJ open, 14(2), e080676.
Levy, M. M., Evans, L. E., & Rhodes, A. (2018). The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update. Intensive care medicine, 44(6), 925-928.
McVeigh, S. E. (2020). Sepsis management in the emergency department. Nurs Clin North Am, 55(1), 71-79.
Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. (2017). National Guidelines for Medical Services for the Management of Sepsis, Decree of the Minister of Health No. HK.01.07/Menkes/342. Retrieved from: https://paralegal.id/peraturan/keputusan-menteri-kesehatan-nomor-hk-01-07-menkes-342-2017/
Nisa, A., Dradjat Respati, S., Ari, P., Antonius, F., Suryanto, E. A., Nanik, S., & Priyo, S. (2021). Emergency room overcrowding factors affecting treatment management of sepsis patients in dr. saiful anwar public hospital. Age (Years), 56(16.6), 60.
Pires, H. H. G., Neves, F. F., & Pazin-Filho, A. (2019). Triage and flow management in sepsis. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 12, 1-8.
Rogan, A., Lockett, J., Peckler, B., Robinson, B., & Raymond, N. (2022). Exploring nursing and medical perceptions of sepsis management in a New Zealand emergency department: A qualitative study. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 34(3), 417-427.
Sartini, M., Carbone, A., Demartini, A., Giribone, L., Oliva, M., Spagnolo, A. M., & Cristina, M. L. (2022). Overcrowding in emergency department: causes, consequences, and solutions—a narrative review. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 9, p. 1625). MDPI.
Sasmito, P., Pranata, S., Pamungkas, R. A., Emaliyawati, E., & Arifani, N. (2024). Challenges of implementing the hour-1 sepsis bundle: a qualitative study from a secondary hospital in Indonesia. Acute and Critical Care, 39(4), 545-553.
Singer, M., Deutschman, C. S., Seymour, C. W., Shankar-Hari, M., Annane, D., Bauer, M., & Angus, D. C. (2016). The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). Jama, 315(8), 801-810.
Sonis, J. D., Benzer, T. I., Black, L., Filbin, M. R., Hayes, B. D., Hibbert, K. A., & Aaronson, E. L. (2020). Utilization of a multidisciplinary emergency department sepsis huddle to reduce time to antibiotics and improve SEP-1 compliance. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38(11), 2400-2404.
Uffen, J. W., Oosterheert, J. J., Schweitzer, V. A., Thursky, K., Kaasjager, H. A. H., & Ekkelenkamp, M. B. (2021). Interventions for rapid recognition and treatment of sepsis in the emergency department: a narrative review. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 27(2), 192-203.
Venkatesh, B., Schlapbach, L., Mason, D., Wilks, K., Seaton, R., Lister, P., & Rice, M. (2022). Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on patient outcomes and antimicrobial use: a before and after cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health–Western Pacific, 18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Leli Mulyati, Nisa Arifani, Priyo Sasmito, Treesia Sujana, Sri Wahyuni Gayatri, Novia Dwi Astuti, Nurfanida Librianty, Sukirman Lie, Elina Deviana, Farly Ihsan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
