Validity and reliability test for assessing the bleeding factor in breast cancer wounds
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33024/minh.v7i12.645
Assessment Breast Cancer Reliability Validity Wounds Bleeding
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the cancer with the highest incidence in women in the world. In Indonesia, breast cancer also ranks first in terms of number and cause of death. Bleeding is a common complication of advanced breast cancer. Identification of bleeding factors in breast cancer wounds is very important. Research instruments are needed to analyze various factors related to bleeding and their indicators
Purpose: To determine the validity and reliability of the construct of factors related to bleeding in breast cancer wounds and their indicators.
Method: A cross-sectional approach, specifically focusing on observational study. The study took place from January to May 2024, in Dr. Soedraso Hospital Pontianak. The independent variable was factors affecting breast cancer wound bleeding the dependent variables is assessment of breast cancer wound bleeding. Using purposive sampling and the Slovin formula, 60 respondents were selected. The validity and reliability tests in this study were conducted using the outer model evaluation in SEM-PLS with SmartPLS 4.0. Validity was assessed through convergent validity using the AVE value and discriminant validity with the Fornell-Larcker criterion. Reliability was evaluated based on outer loading values and composite reliability (Rho-C) to measure internal consistency.
Results: the outer loading value, composite reliability (Rho-C), and average variance extracted (AVE) have met the validity and reliability test standards. The outer loading value of the indicators ranged from 0.628 to 1.000, with the highest value in the indicators of cancer stage, leukocytes, nutritional status (MNA), and bleeding at 1.000. Composite reliability for the variables of wound classification, dressing use and wound care, chemotherapy, therapy, and haematology ranged from 0.776 to 0.903, while the variables of cancer stage, infection, nutritional status, and bleeding each amounted to 1.000. AVE values ranged from 0.599 to 0.822, with the highest value of 1.000 for the variables of cancer stage, infection, nutritional status, and bleeding.
Conclusion: This research conducted validity and reliability tests using the measurement model (outer model) evaluation in SEM-PLS. The assessment included outer loading, composite reliability (Rho-C), AVE, and the Fornell-Larcker criteria. The results confirmed that the research instrument was valid and reliable, making it suitable for analyzing bleeding factors in breast cancer wounds.
Downloads
References
Agustiyaningsih, A. F., Rohyadi, Y., KD, S. D., & Tursini, Y. (2021). Gambaran Kualitas Hidup Pasien Kanker Payudara. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia Florence Nightingale, 1(1), 1-6.
Bell, D., & Mirring, G. (2019). Aboriginal Fish Farms Atop Volcanoes. Health Affairs, 31, 1439-1449.
Dharma, K. K., & Fitarsih, N. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perawat Dalam Kesiapan Pasien Pre Operasi Diruang Rawat Inap Rsud Dr. Soedarso Pontianak. Scientific Journal Of Nursing Research, 4(1), 1-12.
Ferlay, J., Ervik, M., Lam, F., Colombet, M., Mery, L., Piñeros, M., & Bray, F. (2020). Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon: International Agency For Research On Cancer, 20182020.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S., & Ray, S. (2021). An Introduction To Structural Equation Modeling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook, 1-29.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When To Use And How To Report The Results Of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
Johnstone, C., & Rich, S. E. (2018). Bleeding In Cancer Patients And Its Treatment: A Review. Annals Of Palliative Medicine, 7(2), 26573-26273.
Kurniawan, A. (2013). Penatalaksanaan Perdarahan Pada Kanker. Indonesian Journal Of Cancer, 7(4), 153.
Loeffler, A. G. (2017). Patofisiologi Untuk Profesi Kesehatan: Epidemiologi, Diagnosa Dan Pengobatan Edisi 6. Jakarta: EGC.
Mclaughlin, S. A., Staley, A. C., Vicini, F., Thiruchelvam, P., Hutchison, N. A., Mendez, J., & Feldman, S. M. (2017). Considerations For Clinicians In The Diagnosis, Prevention, And Treatment Of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Recommendations From A Multidisciplinary Expert Asbrs Panel: Part 1: Definitions, Assessments, Education, And Future Directions. Annals Of Surgical Oncology, 24, 2818-2826.
Nadiva, D. H., & Muafiro, A. (2019). Deskripsi Perkembangan Keadaan Luka Kanker Payudara Post Mastektomi Setelah Perawatan Luka. Jurnal Keperawatan Vol. XII No. 1 April 2019. Hal-49, 56.
Nicodème, M., Dureau, S., Chéron, M., Kriegel, I., Trenchand, M., Bauër, P., & Fromantin, I. (2021). Frequency And Management Of Hemorrhagic Malignant Wounds: A Retrospective, Single-Center, Observational Study. Journal Of Pain And Symptom Management, 62(1), 134-140.
Nwaogu, I. Y., Bommarito, K., Olsen, M. A., & Margenthaler, J. A. (2015). Economic Impact Of Bleeding Complications After Mastectomy. Journal Of Surgical Research, 199(1), 77-83.
Ostby, P. L., Armer, J. M., Dale, P. S., Van Loo, M. J., Wilbanks, C. L., & Stewart, B. R. (2014). Surveillance Recommendations In Reducing Risk Of And Optimally Managing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. Journal Of Personalized Medicine, 4(3), 424-447.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). Smartpls 3. Boenningstedt. Smartpls Gmbh, 2015.
Sari, N., Haryanto, H., & Hastuti, L. (2024). Factors Contributing To Bleeding In Breast Cancer Wounds: A Literature Review. Indonesian Contemporary Nursing Journal (ICON Journal), 9(1), 51-61.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Handbook Of Market Research (Pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Suparna, K., & Sari, L. M. K. K. S. (2022). Kanker Payudara: Diagnostik, Faktor Risiko, Dan Stadium. Ganesha Medicina, 2(1), 42-48.
Tilley, C., Lipson, J., & Ramos, M. (2016). Palliative Wound Care For Malignant Fungating Wounds: Holistic Considerations At End-Of-Life. Nursing Clinics, 51(3), 513-531.
Toesca, A., Peradze, N., Manconi, A., Galimberti, V., Intra, M., Colleoni, M., & Veronesi, P. (2017). Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy For The Treatment Of Breast Cancer: Feasibility And Safety Study. The Breast, 31, 51-56.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurmila Sari, Haryanto Haryanto, Suriadi Jais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
