Human factors and ergonomics strategies in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review of rescuer fatigue and CPR quality outcomes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33024/min.v9i8.4353
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Ergonomics Fatigue Human Factors Nurses Simulation Training
Abstract
Background: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is physically and cognitively demanding, while rescuer fatigue can reduce chest-compression performance. Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) provides a systems-based approach integrating posture, workload, teamwork, technology, and the clinical environment.
Purpose: To synthesize primary evidence regarding the effects of HFE-informed CPR education and performance strategies on rescuer fatigue and CPR quality.
Method: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed primary studies published between January 2020 and December 2025. Eligible studies examined at least one HFE component and reported fatigue, CPR-quality, or team-performance outcomes. Twenty primary studies were included, critically appraised using design-appropriate Joanna Briggs Institute tools, and narratively synthesized because of methodological heterogeneity.
Results: Real-time feedback, ergonomically appropriate positioning, workload management, planned compressor rotation, effective leadership, and team-based simulation generally improved compression depth, compression rate, chest-compression fraction, and team coordination. Conversely, prolonged chest compressions, suboptimal posture, forward leaning, personal protective equipment, and demanding patient positions increased rescuer fatigue. Nevertheless, evidence directly evaluating a comprehensive HFE-based CPR training program specifically for nurses remained limited.
Conclusion: HFE-informed strategies can improve immediate CPR performance, strengthen team coordination, and support fatigue management. However, a standardized nurse-focused HFE training program should be evaluated through robust multicenter clinical studies assessing fatigue, CPR quality, skill retention, musculoskeletal effects, and patient-centered outcomes.
Downloads
References
Augusto, J. B., Santos, M. B., Faria, D., Alves, P., Roque, D., Morais, J., Gil, V., & Morais, C. (2020). Real-time visual feedback device improves quality of chest compressions: A manikin study. Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma, 8(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2020.83080.
Bae, G. E., Choi, A., Beom, J. H., Kim, M. J., Chung, H. S., Min, I. K., Chung, S. P., & Kim, J. H. (2021). Correlation between real-time heart rate and fatigue in chest compression providers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A simulation-based interventional study. Medicine, 100(16), e25425. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025425.
Cheng, A., Magid, D. J., Auerbach, M., Bhanji, F., Bigham, B. L., Blewer, A. L., Dainty, K. N., Diederich, E., Lin, Y., Leary, M., Mahgoub, M., Mancini, M. E., Navarro, K., & Donoghue, A. (2020). Part 6: Resuscitation Education Science: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation, 142(16_suppl_2), S551–S579. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000903.
Hirsch, P., Pears, K., Klasen, M., Kiefer, C., Koch, I., & Sopka, S. (2025). The effects of cognitive-motor multitasking demands on the quality of chest compressions in CPR—A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Medicine, Volume 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1536796.
Lee, H., Kim, J., Joo, S., Na, S. H., Lee, S., Ko, S. B., Lee, J., Oh, S. Y., Ha, E. J., & Ryu, H. G. (2023a). The effect of audiovisual feedback of monitor/defibrillators on percentage of appropriate compression depth and rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. BMC Anesthesiology, 23(1), 334. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02304-9.
Lee, P. H., Lai, H. Y., Hsieh, T. C., & Wu, W. R. (2023b). Using real-time device-based visual feedback in CPR recertification programs: A prospective randomised controlled study. Nurse Education Today, 124, 105755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105755.
Leo, W. Z., Chua, D., Tan, H. C., & Ho, V. K. (2023). Chest compression quality and patient outcomes with the use of a CPR feedback device: A retrospective study. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 19852. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46862-x.
Li, B., Zhang, P., Xu, S., Liu, Q., Ma, Y., Zhou, S., Xu, L., & Sun, P. (2024). Assessment of the quality of manual chest compressions and rescuer fatigue in different cardiopulmonary resuscitation positions. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 39(6), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X25000032.
Li, Q., Li, B., Weng, F., Zhu, X., Hu, Z., Xu, L., Zhang, Q., & Sun, P. (2025). Effects of forward-leaning cardiopulmonary resuscitation on chest compression quality and rescuer fatigue. BMC Emergency Medicine, 25(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01389-4.
Lin, Y., Savage, T., Gravel, G., Davidson, J., Tofil, N., Duff, J., & Cheng, A. (2023). Who is the real team leader? Comparing leadership performance of the team leader and CPR Coach during simulated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation Plus, 14, 100400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100400.
Liu, Q., Li, B., Zhou, S., Gu, L., Xue, L., Lu, R., Xu, L., & Sun, P. (2024). The effect of hand and body position on chest compression quality and rescuer fatigue in prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation Plus, 20, 100787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100787.
Merchant, R. M., Topjian, A. A., Panchal, A. R., Cheng, A., Aziz, K., Berg, K. M., Lavonas, E. J., Magid, D. J., & On behalf of the Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Neonatal Life Support, Resuscitation Education Science, and Systems of Care Writing Groups, P. B. and A. L. S. (2020). Part 1: Executive Summary: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation, 142(16_suppl_2), S337–S357. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000918.
Nabecker, S., Huwendiek, S., Seidl, C., Hana, A., Theiler, L., & Greif, R. (2022). Assessment of human factors after advanced life support courses comparing simulated team and real team assessment: A randomized controlled cohort trial. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Volume 9-2022. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.840114.
Olasveengen, T. M., Semeraro, F., Ristagno, G., Castren, M., Handley, A., Kuzovlev, A., Monsieurs, K. G., Raffay, V., Smyth, M., Soar, J., Svavarsdottir, H., & Perkins, G. D. (2021). European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Basic Life Support. Resuscitation, 161, 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.009.
Palmisano, F., Santuari, N., Moletta, C., Ambrosi, E., & Rizzoli, A. (2024). The effect of a team-based blended simulation training program on cardiopulmonary resuscitation on healthcare professionals’ perception, performance, and costs: a mixed-method study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1524. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06543-3.
Panchal, A. R., Bartos, J. A., Cabañas, J. G., Donnino, M. W., Drennan, I. R., Hirsch, K. G., & Berg, K. M. (2020). Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 142(16_Suppl_2), S366-S468. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916.
Picard, C., Drew, R., Norris, C. M., O’Dochartaigh, D., Burnett, C., Keddie, C., & Douma, M. J. (2022). Cardiac arrest quality improvement: a single-center evaluation of resuscitations using defibrillator, feedback device, and survey data. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 48(2), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2021.11.005.
Preuss, M., Röhrig, R., Hübel, C., Vos, C., Unterkofler, J., Brokmann, J. C., Willmes, K., & Plata, C. (2025). Using an audiovisual feedback device improves cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during day and night–a randomized controlled simulation study. BMC Emergency Medicine, 25(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01249-1.
Ruibal-Lista, B., Camacho-Alegre, P., Diez-Fernández, P., & López-García, S. (2025). Fatigue and CPR quality in lifeguards: analysis after 100-and 200-meter rescues. Signa Vitae, 21(11), 70. https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2025.159.
Sa-Couto, C., Sa-Couto, P., Nicolau, A., Lazarovici, M., Ericsson, C., Vieira-Marques, P., & Bispo, I. (2025). Impact of rescuer position, arm angle, and anthropometric variables on muscle fatigue during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an international multicentric randomized crossover simulation study. Resuscitation Plus, 24, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100971.
Schwartze, J. T., Das, S., Suggitt, D., Baxter, J., Tunstall, S., Ronan, N., Stannard, H., Rezgui, A., Jafar, W., & Baxter, D. N. (2024). Ward-based in situ simulation: lessons learnt from a UK District General Hospital. BMJ Open Quality, 13(2), e002571. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002571.
Suet, M. D. G., Blanie, M. D. A., de Montblanc, M. D. J., Roulleau, M. D. P., & Benhamou, M. D. D. (2020). External cardiac massage training of medical students: a randomized comparison of two feedback methods to standard training. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 59(2), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.04.058.
Tian, Y., Tu, X., Zhou, X., Yu, J., Luo, S., Ma, L., Liu, C., Zhao, Y., & Jin, X. (2021). Wearing a N95 mask increases rescuer’s fatigue and decreases chest compression quality in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 44, 434–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.065.
Won, M., Kim, J. H., Ahn, C., Lee, S. Y., & Oh, Y. (2024). Effectiveness of real-time chest compression feedback devices for individuals experienced in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled simulation study. Signa Vitae, 20(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22514/sv.2024.119
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ni Wayan Sukerti, Ni Luh Putu Inca Buntari Agustini, Ni Luh Dwi Indrayani, I Wayan Edi Sanjana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.