Comparison of sutureless and sutured circumcision in pediatric populations: A systematic review

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33024/minh.v9i4.3528

Authors

  • Muhammad Ikhsan Farhan Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Jufriady Ismy Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Ahmad Fauzan Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Malikussaleh; Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Vannisa Fadya Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Syiah Kuala

Circumcision Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Pediatric

Abstract

Background: Circumcision is one of the most commonly performed pediatric surgical procedures and is traditionally closed using absorbable sutures. However, conventional suturing may increase postoperative pain, edema, infection risk, foreign-body reactions, and cosmetic irregularities. Sutureless techniques, including cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesives and clamp-assisted methods, have emerged as minimally invasive alternatives that may improve wound healing and reduce complications.

Purpose: To systematically compare the safety, procedural efficiency, cosmetic outcomes, and postoperative pain associated with sutureless versus conventional sutured circumcision in pediatric populations.

Method: This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Wiley, and Google Scholar databases. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Revised Tool for Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials (ROB 2). Three eligible comparative studies were included in the final analysis.

Results: Sutureless circumcision demonstrated several advantages over conventional sutured techniques, including shorter operative time, fewer postoperative complications, and superior cosmetic outcomes. Most suture-related adverse events, such as local irritation and foreign-body reactions, were reported exclusively in the sutured groups. In addition, patients undergoing sutureless procedures generally experienced lower postoperative pain scores.

Conclusion: Sutureless circumcision using cyanoacrylate adhesives appears to be a safe and effective alternative to traditional sutured closure, offering improved procedural efficiency and postoperative outcomes. Nevertheless, the current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous study populations, and non-standardized outcome measures. Further large-scale, well-designed comparative studies are needed to establish robust clinical recommendations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alemayehu, H., Sharp, N. E., Gonzalez, K., Poola, A. S., Snyder, C. L., & Peter, S. D. S. (2017). The role of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate in prevention of penile adhesions after circumcision: a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of pediatric surgery, 52(12), 1886-1890.

Aravind, K., Sunil, C. G., Chandrasekar, S., Shidlingappa, S. S., Kamat, V., Kulkarni, M., & Vaidyanathan, R. (2024). Cyanoacrylate vs. sutures in clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds–a randomised control study. Innovative Surgical Sciences, 9(1), 47-54.

Azmi, Y. A., Yogiswara, N., & Renaldo, J. (2022). The efficacy of tissue glue in pediatric circumcision wound approximation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 18(3), 327-333.

Azoz, M. E., Osman, A. K., Idris, M. A., Musa, M. A., Alhasan, M. M., Baloul, S. S., & Bakhiet, M. Y. (2025). Penile epidermoid inclusion cyst after circumcision: A case report. Urology Case Reports, 103151.

Bar-Yaakov, N., Mano, R., Ekstein, M., Savin, Z., Dekalo, S., Ben-Chaim, J., & Bar-Yosef, Y. (2022). Parental regret following decision to revise circumcision. Frontiers in pediatrics, 10, 855893.

Bawazir, O. A., & Banaja, A. M. (2020). Sutureless versus interrupted sutures techniques for neonatal circumcision; a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 16(4), 493-e1.

Dhaliwal, K., Dor, K., George, M., & Wei, X. (2025). Complications Associated with Circumcision in a Community-Based Hospital. PRiMER: Peer-Reviewed Reports in Medical Education Research, 9, 25.

Lovin, J. M., Stone, K. M., Pickett, J. K., & Kirsch, A. J. (2022). Sutureless circumcision using monopolar diathermy and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate is safe and effective in a cohort of 634 post-neonatal prepubescent boys. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 18(6), 790-795.

Martin, A., Nataraja, R. M., Kimber, C., & Pacilli, M. (2018). The use of tissue glue for circumcision in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology, 115, 21-28.

Millard, P. S., & Goldstuck, N. (2020). Minimally invasive, sutureless, adolescent male circumcision with topical anesthetic: a field trial of Unicirc, a single-use surgical instrument. Translational Andrology and Urology, 9(2), 516.

Najar, F. A., Nabi, U., Mufti, G. N., Baba, A. A., & Bhat, N. A. (2025). Sutureless Neonatal Circumcision Using 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate (Dermabond): A Prospective Observational Study From A Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of Neonatal Surgery, 14(21s), 1709–1719. Retrieved from: https://www.jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/9171

Pervez, M. M., Narmeen, T., Halder, A. L., Shahnaz, M., & Salehin, S. A. (2025). Outcome of Continuous versus Interrupted Sutures for Circumcision. Medicine Today, 37(1), 73-77.

Raut, A. (2019). Sutureless versus sutured circumcision: A comparative study. Urology Annals, 11(1), 87-90.

Rushbrook, J. L., White, G., Kidger, L., Marsh, P., & Taggart, T. F. (2014). The antibacterial effect of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond®) skin adhesive. Journal of infection prevention, 15(6), 236-239.

Singer, A. J., Quinn, J. V., Clark, R. E., Hollander, J. E., & Group, T. S. (2002). Closure of lacerations and incisions with octylcyanoacrylate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surgery, 131(3), 270-276.

Singer, A. J., Quinn, J. V., & Hollander, J. E. (2008). The cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives. The American journal of emergency medicine, 26(4), 490-496.

Soomro, B. A., Arain, A. G., Abbas, S., Qudratullah, S., Bukhari, S. M. A., & Ahmed, K. (2025). Circumcision of Infants with Gomco Clamp-An Effective and Safe Method, in A Tertiary Care Setting: Circumcision of Infants with Gomco Clamp-An Effective and Safe Method. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, 293-297.

Spinelli, C., Bertocchini, A., Leoni, M., Calani, C., Morganti, R., & Strambi, S. (2020). Pediatric circumcision using n‐butyl‐cyanoacrylate plus MS monomer: Bacteriostatic and cosmetic advantages over suture. Surgical Practice, 24(4), 139-143.

Tandon, S., Ensor, N. D., Pacilli, M., Laird, A. J., Bortagaray, J. I., Stunden, R. J., & Nataraja, R. M. (2022). Tissue adhesive, adhesive tape, and sutures for skin closure of paediatric surgical wounds: prospective randomized clinical trial. British Journal of Surgery, 109(11), 1087-1095.

Yu, J., Tang, R., & Ding, K. (2022). Analysis of related factors between the occurrence of secondary epidermoid cyst of penis and circumcision. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 13563.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-04

How to Cite

Comparison of sutureless and sutured circumcision in pediatric populations: A systematic review. (2026). MIN, 9(4), 685-694. https://doi.org/10.33024/minh.v9i4.3528