The effectiveness of effleurage and counter-pressure massage in reducing labor pain intensity during the first stage of labor: A literature review

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56922/mchc.v5i5.4138

Authors

  • Ni Made Budiartini Poltekkes Kemenkes Denpasar
  • Ni Wayan Ariyani Poltekkes Kemenkes Denpasar
  • Ni Komang Yuni Rahyani Poltekkes Kemenkes Denpasar

Effleurage Massage Counter-Pressure Massage First Stage of Labor Labor Pain Nonpharmacological Intervention

Abstract

Background: Labor pain during the first stage of labor is a physiological condition caused primarily by uterine contractions, cervical dilatation, and pressure on the pelvic structures. Although pharmacological methods are available, nonpharmacological interventions such as effleurage and counter-pressure massage are increasingly used because they are simple, inexpensive, and have minimal adverse effects. However, evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of these techniques remains variable.

Purpose: To review and synthesize the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of effleurage and counter-pressure massage in reducing labor pain intensity during the first stage of labor.

Method: A literature review was conducted through searches of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar for articles published between January 2021 and June 2026. Articles were selected according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible studies included original research articles, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and clinical trials involving women in the first stage of labor and evaluating effleurage, counter-pressure, or related massage interventions. Nine articles were included in the review.

Results: The reviewed studies generally demonstrated that massage-based nonpharmacological interventions reduced labor pain intensity and improved maternal comfort. Effleurage massage was associated with reduced pain through tactile stimulation, relaxation, and distraction, whereas counter-pressure appeared particularly beneficial for women experiencing lower back pain during contractions. Direct comparative evidence indicated that both techniques were effective, although some studies reported greater pain reduction with counter-pressure. Other benefits included reduced anxiety, increased comfort, and improved childbirth satisfaction.

Conclusion: Effleurage and counter-pressure massage are promising nonpharmacological interventions for managing pain during the first stage of labor. Effleurage may be particularly useful for promoting relaxation and reducing generalized pain perception, whereas counter-pressure may be more appropriate for women experiencing predominant lower back pain. The choice of technique should consider maternal preference, pain location, labor progression, and practitioner skill.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azima, S., Sayadi, M., & Yazdanpanahi, Z. (2026). “Comparative effects of rotational effleurage and connective tissue massage on labor pain, duration, and perineal outcomes in pregnant women”: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 26(1), 427.

Beyable, A. A., Bayable, S. D., & Ashebir, Y. G. (2022). Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic labor pain management techniques in a resource-limited setting: A systematic review. Annals of medicine and surgery, 74, 103312.

Chang, C. Y., Gau, M. L., Huang, C. J., & Cheng, H. M. (2022). Effects of non-pharmacological coping strategies for reducing labor pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Plos one, 17(1), e0261493.

Doloksaribu, M., Barus, E. B., & Fitrayani, L. (2026). The Effectiveness Of Counterpressure With Effleurage Massage On Labor Pain. International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (Ijhess), 8(3).

Goh, Y. P., Tan, P. C., Hong, J. G. S., Sulaiman, S., & Omar, S. Z. (2021). Combined massage and warm compress to the perineum during active second stage of labor in nulliparas: A randomized trial. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 155(3), 532-538.

Hu, Y., Lu, H., Huang, J., & Zang, Y. (2021). Efficacy and safety of non‐pharmacological interventions for labour pain management: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta‐analysis. Journal of clinical nursing, 30(23-24), 3398-3414.

Kaçar, N., & Keser, N. Ö. (2021). Comparison of the effect of mechanical massage and warm mechanical massage application on perceived labor pain and childbirth experience: A randomized clinical trial. European Journal of Midwifery, 5, 5.

Karatopuk, S., & Yarıcı, F. (2023). Determining the effect of inhalation and lavender essential oil massage therapy on the severity of perceived labor pain in primiparous women: A randomized controlled trial. Explore, 19(1), 107-114.

M Ahmed, A., RH Ahmed, S., A Ali, H., Salah Shalaby, N., F El-shamy, F., & Gaber Salem, S. (2021). Effect of Counter-Pressure Versus Effleurage Massages on Labor Pain Intensity Among Parturient Women. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 12(3), 408-420.

Nori, W., Kassim, M. A. K., Helmi, Z. R., Pantazi, A. C., Brezeanu, D., Brezeanu, A. M., & Serbanescu, L. (2023). Non-pharmacological pain management in labor: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(23), 7203.

Pratiwi, A. M., Zuliyati, I. C., & Fatimatasari, F. (2021). Abdominal lifting, effleurage, and deep back massages effective in reducing pain during active phase of first stage labor. JNKI (Jurnal Ners dan Kebidanan Indonesia)(Indonesian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery), 9(3), 175-182.

Rabello, M. (2023). Massage therapy during labor and childbirth outcomes: An integrative review. Healthcare.

Taşkın, A., & Ergin, A. (2022). Effect of hot shower application on pain anxiety and comfort in the first stage of labor: A randomized controlled study. Health Care for Women International, 43(5), 431-447.

Türkmen, H., & Oran, N. T. (2021). Massage and heat application on labor pain and comfort: A quasi-randomized controlled experimental study. Explore, 17(5), 438-445.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

Issue

Section

Articles