Diagnostic accuracy of hemoglobin-a1c compared to fasting plasma glucose for early detection of diabetes mellitus: A systematic review
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33024/hjk.v19i10.1659
Diabetes Mellitus Deteksi Dini Fasting Plasma Glucose Hemoglobin A1c
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global health problem with rising prevalence, including in Indonesia. Diagnosis traditionally relies on fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), but both have technical limitations. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has emerged as an alternative, reflecting average glucose levels over the previous 2–3 months.
Purpose: To review the comparative diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c versus FPG in early detection of DM.
Method: Systematic literature review research using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method and the PICOS approach, namely P (problem, patient, or population), I (intervention, prognostic factor, or exposure), C (comparison or control), O (outcome) and S (study). Writing literature with keywords “HbA1c” OR “Fasting Plasma Glucose”, AND “Diabetes Mellitus”. From the 159 articles identified, screening was conducted according to the topic of discussion, resulting in 5 articles related to the comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c with FPG in the early detection of DM.
Results: Five primary studies involving 54,746 participants from Asia and the United States met inclusion criteria. Most applied HbA1c cut-offs ≥6.5% and FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L. Findings showed HbA1c had higher sensitivity (up to 82.5% in Singapore), whereas FPG demonstrated greater specificity (up to 96.9%) with superior positive predictive value. Area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.73–0.93; HbA1c performed better in community-based populations, while FPG was more accurate in high-risk clinical populations. Heterogeneity was influenced by cut-off variation, population characteristics, comorbidities, age, BMI, and reference standards.
Conclusion: HbA1c is more practical and sensitive for large-scale community screening, while FPG remains highly specific and appropriate for diagnostic confirmation. Selection of diagnostic method should consider clinical context, population characteristics, and local resource availability.
Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus; Early Detection; Fasting Plasma Glucose; Hemoglobin A1c.
Pendahuluan: Diabetes melitus (DM) merupakan masalah kesehatan global dengan prevalensi meningkat, termasuk di Indonesia. Diagnosis DM umumnya mengandalkan glukosa plasma puasa (FPG) atau uji toleransi glukosa oral (OGTT), namun keduanya memiliki keterbatasan teknis. Pemeriksaan hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) menjadi alternatif karena merefleksikan kadar glukosa rata-rata 2–3 bulan terakhir. Penelitian ini bertujuan meninjau perbandingan akurasi diagnostik HbA1c dengan FPG dalam deteksi dini DM.
Tujuan: Untuk mengevaluasi akurasi diagnostik komparatif antara HbA1c dan FPG dalam deteksi dini diabetes mellitus (DM).
Metode: Penelitian literature review menggunakan metode Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Desain pencarian artikel dengan merumuskan PICOS yaitu P (problem, patient, or population), I (intervention, prognostic factor, or exposure), C (comparison or control), O (outcome) dan S (study). Pencarian literatur yang digunakan berasal dari beberapa database, antara lain PubMed, Scopus, Embase, dan Cochrane Library dengan kata kunci “HbA1c” OR “Fasting Plasma Glucose”, AND “Diabetes Mellitus”. Mengidentifikasi 159 artikel selanjutnya dilakukan penyaringan sesuai dengan topik bahasan mendapatkan 5 artikel yang terkait perbandingan akurasi diagnostik HbA1c dengan FPG dalam deteksi dini DM.
Hasil: 5 studi primer dari Asia dan Amerika memenuhi kriteria. Sebagian besar menggunakan cut-off HbA1c ≥6.5% dan FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L. Hasil menunjukkan HbA1c memiliki sensitivitas lebih tinggi (hingga 82.5% di Singapura), sedangkan FPG lebih spesifik (hingga 96.9%) dengan nilai prediktif positif lebih baik. Area under the curve (AUC) bervariasi 0.73–0.93; HbA1c lebih unggul pada populasi komunitas, sedangkan FPG lebih akurat pada populasi klinis berisiko tinggi. Variasi cut-off, populasi, komorbid, usia, BMI, dan standar referensi memengaruhi heterogenitas hasil.
Simpulan: HbA1c lebih praktis dan sensitif untuk skrining populasi luas, sementara FPG tetap lebih spesifik dan sesuai untuk konfirmasi diagnosis. Pemilihan metode perlu disesuaikan dengan konteks klinis, karakteristik populasi, dan sumber daya lokal.
Kata Kunci: Diabetes Mellitus; Deteksi Dini; Fasting Plasma Glucose; Hemoglobin A1c.
Downloads
References
Ang, S. H., Thevarajah, M., Alias, Y., & Khor, S. M. (2015). Current Aspects In Hemoglobin A1c Detection: A Review. Clinica Chimica Acta, 439, 202-211.
Anggraini, R., Nadatein, I., & Astuti, P. (2020). Relationship Of Hba1c With Fasting Blood Glucose On Diagnostic Values And Lifestyle In Type Ii Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Medicra (Journal Of Medical Laboratory Science/Technology), 3(1), 5-11.
Apriliany, F., Ikawati, Z., & Putu Pramantara, I. D. (2021). Pengaruh Komorbid Dan Jenis Terapi Terhadap Outcome Kolesterol Total Pasien Dislipidemia.
Bergman, M., Abdul-Ghani, M., Neves, J. S., Monteiro, M. P., Medina, J. L., Dorcely, B., & Buysschaert, M. (2020). Pitfalls Of Hba1c In The Diagnosis Of Diabetes. The Journal Of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 105(8), 2803-2811.
Butler, A. E., English, E., Kilpatrick, E. S., Östlundh, L., Chemaitelly, H. S., Abu-Raddad, L. J., & John, W. G. (2021). Diagnosing Type 2 Diabetes Using Hemoglobin A1c: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of The Diagnostic Cutpoint Based On Microvascular Complications. Acta Diabetologica, 58(3), 279-300.
Chan, L., Yu, E. Y. T., Wan, E. Y. F., Wong, S. Y. S., Chao, D. V. K., Ko, W. W. K., & Lam, C. L. K. (2025). Improving Type 2 Diabetes Detection Among At-Risk Individuals–Comparing The Effectiveness Of Active Opportunistic Screening Using Spot Capillary-Hba1c Testing And Venous Hba1c Testing: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Bmc Medicine, 23(1), 190.
Chivese, T., Hirst, J., Matizanadzo, J. T., Custodio, M., Farmer, A., Norris, S., & Levitt, N. (2022). The Diagnostic Accuracy Of Hba1c, Compared To The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test, For Screening For Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus In Africa—A Systematic Review And Meta‐Analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 39(4), E14754.
Chung, J. K. O., Xue, H., Pang, E. W. H., & Tam, D. C. C. (2017). Accuracy Of Fasting Plasma Glucose And Hemoglobin A1c Testing For The Early Detection Of Diabetes: A Pilot Study. Frontiers In Laboratory Medicine, 1(2), 76-81.
Duong, K. N., Tan, C. J., Rattanasiri, S., Thakkinstian, A., Anothaisintawee, T., & Chaiyakunapruk, N. (2023). Comparison Of Diagnostic Accuracy For Diabetes Diagnosis: A Systematic Review And Network Meta-Analysis. Frontiers In Medicine, 10, 1016381.
Federation, I. D., & Atlas, I. D. (2021). International Daibetes Federation 2021. Idf Diabetes Atlas.
Garonzi, C., Maguolo, A., & Maffeis, C. (2023). Pros And Cons Of Current Diagnostic Tools For Risk-Based Screening Of Prediabetes And Type 2 Diabetes In Children And Adolescents With Overweight Or Obesity. Hormone Research In Paediatrics, 96(4), 356-365.
Haryati, A. I., & Tyas, T. A. W. (2022). Perbandingan Kadar Hba1c Pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 Yang Disertai Hipertensi Dan Tanpa Hipertensi Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Duri, Mandau, Bengkalis, Riau. Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, 18(1), 33-40.
Ho-Pham, L. T., Nguyen, U. D., Tran, T. X., & Nguyen, T. V. (2017). Discordance In The Diagnosis Of Diabetes: Comparison Between Hba1c And Fasting Plasma Glucose. Plos One, 12(8), E0182192.
Kaur, G., Lakshmi, P. V. M., Rastogi, A., Bhansali, A., Jain, S., Teerawattananon, Y., & Prinja, S. (2020). Diagnostic Accuracy Of Tests For Type 2 Diabetes And Prediabetes: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Plos One, 15(11), E0242415.
Kodama, S., Yamada, T., Yagyuda, N., Tanaka, N., Wu, S., Ferreira, E. D. A., & Sone, H. (2025). Comparison Of The Ability To Diagnose Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Between Glycated Albumin Or Fructosamine And Hemoglobin A1c—A Meta-Analysis Of Diagnostic Studies. Systematic Reviews, 14(1), 144.
Lim, W. Y., Ma, S., Heng, D., Tai, E. S., Khoo, C. M., & Loh, T. P. (2018). Screening For Diabetes With Hba1c: Test Performance Of Hba1c Compared To Fasting Plasma Glucose Among Chinese, Malay And Indian Community Residents In Singapore. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 12419.
Murad, N. A. A., Abdullah, N., Kamaruddin, M. A., Abd Jalal, N., Ismail, N., Yusof, N. A. M., & Jamal, R. (2021). Discordance Between Fasting Plasma Glucose (Fpg) And Hba1c In Diagnosing Diabetes And Pre-Diabetes In The Malaysian Cohort. Journal Of The Asean Federation Of Endocrine Societies, 36(2), 127.
Schnell, O., Crocker, J. B., & Weng, J. (2017). Impact Of Hba1c Testing At Point Of Care On Diabetes Management. Journal Of Diabetes Science And Technology, 11(3), 611-617.
Sihombing, M. (2017). Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Hipertensi Pada Penduduk Indonesia Yang Menderita Diabetes Melitus (Data Riskesdas 2013). Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan, 45(1), 53-64.
Suastika, K. (2021). Clinical Use And Limitation Of Hemoglobin A1c Examination. Clinical Diabetology, 10(3), 299-306.
Zhang, B., Zhang, B., Zhou, Z., Guo, Y., & Wang, D. (2021). The Value Of Glycosylated Hemoglobin In The Diagnosis Of Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Bmc Endocrine Disorders, 21(1), 82.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Holistik Jurnal Kesehatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
